The Atlantic Wall

The Atlantic Wall

Between 1942 and 1944, fully anticipating an Allied invasion of mainland Europe, Germany undertook a program to construct an extensive array of fortifications and coastal defense systems. On 23rd March 1942 Hitler issued Führer Directive No. 40, which called for the creation of an “Atlantic Wall” (or Atlantikwall in German).

Experience History for Yourself!
Get a discount of 15% to 70% on D-Day accommodations and tours! Look for deals here:
D-Day Hotels and Tours

 

Stretching for over 3,000 miles, the series of bunkers, casemates, pillboxes and a variety of beach obstacles was installed from North Cape in Norway to the border area between France and Spain. Other fortifications were constructed on the British Channel Islands – and some of the best-preserved examples can today be found on Jersey and Guernsey.

M272 Casemates With Skoda Gun
M272 Casemates With Skoda Gun

With characteristic German efficiency, the plans for the multitude of different bunkers, casemates and other buildings were known as the Regelbau system, meaning “standard design” in German.

The standardized design of German defenses pre-dated the Second World War, with the German army command looking at aspects as early as 1933 with their publication the “Order for the Construction of Permanent Fortifications”. Standardization helped with the planning and budgeting aspects of construction projects, and also helped to simplify the manufacture of equipment and control of materials.

American Troops In Front Of An H667 Casemate
American Troops In Front Of An H667 Casemate

The construction of the Siegfried Line (or “Westwall”) which began in 1936 took advantage of the designs used in the construction of the earlier defensive Neckar-Enz and Wetterau-Main-Tauber positions, but also facilitated the improvements to some designs. Prior to the outbreak of war, responsibility for the construction of defenses was given to the Organisation Todt (OT), although in some cases, where army or naval engineers were responsible for a major construction rather than the Organisation Todt, the Regelbau system was not always followed. These were known as “sonderkonstruktion”, or “special design”.

By the time of D-Day there were around 700 approved designs, ranging from small machine gun emplacements to huge casemates for long range guns. Each design had a specific purpose, and designs had been updated by the Germans as they had overrun enemy facilities which they then inspected and tested. Designs incorporated standard features, such as an entrance door at right angles, armored air intakes and 30mm steel doors.

Rommel Tetrahedra Small
Feldmarschall Erwin Rommel being shown a model of the tetrahedra beach obstacle

However, it is estimated that less than half of the Atlantic Wall structures in France fully adhere to the Regelbau standards, with terrain features accounting for most of the differences – especially with positioning of the different components within a strongpoint. A shortage of the necessary materials also accounted for some compromise in the quality specified for some structures.

Organization Todt supplied supervisors and labor as well as organizing supplies, machinery and transport to supplement the staff and equipment of construction companies. Many of these companies were German, however, construction companies in occupied countries could also bid for contracts.

The war will be won or lost on the beaches. We’ll have only one chance to stop the enemy and that’s while he’s in the water … struggling to get ashore … everything we have must be on the coast … the first twenty-four hours of the invasion will be decisive … for the Allies, as well as Germany, it will be the longest day.

  • Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, German Army

In the west, the building of the Atlantic Wall initially concentrated on protecting ports and providing shelter for U-boats and other vessels of the Kriegsmarine (German Navy). This was subsequently expanded to include the wider coastal areas. In 1943, as the prospect of Allied invasion grew closer, Hitler tasked Field Marshall Erwin Rommel’s headquarters with the control of the anti-invasion forces along the Channel Coast from Denmark to Brittany.

Rommel Inspects Beach Defenses In Normandy
Rommel Inspects Beach Defenses In Normandy

After an inspection of the coastline in December 1943, Rommel determined there to be an insufficient number of troops and noted the weakness of the defenses and the lack of a uniform plan in the erection of these defenses. He declared the beaches should be regarded as the main line of resistance (MLR) and wanted to place all the infantry and artillery in a strong belt along the coast.

In addition, all positions, he determined, were to be extensively mined, and all approaches were to be blocked by obstacles of varying types. The central element of Rommel’s plan was the construction of a six-mile deep “Death Barrier” extending the length of his command.

Tobruk
Cutaway diagram of a tobruk, this one fitted with the turret from a captured French tank

To cope with the increased requirements, Rommel augmented the Todt Organization with workers from France and even his own troops. The workforce provided by the OT ranged from well-treated, skilled volunteers, engineers and designers to badly-treated slave labor, including captured prisoners of war.

The Vichy government in France conscripted 600,000 French civilians to work for OT on the construction projects in France, Belgium and the Netherlands. It is known that some workers on Atlantic Wall constructions deliberately committed acts of sabotage at some sites. In doing so, they made some buildings weaker and therefore more susceptible to damage by Allied bombs and artillery shells.

Large R683 Casemate
Large R683 Casemate

To offset shortages, captured equipment from the French and other occupied armies were incorporated into the defenses, with some casemates designed for non-German artillery, anti-tank and machine guns. The use of turrets from obsolete tanks were also incorporated into some tobrukstand (tobruk pits).

The Germans believed the Allied landings, when they came, would take place at high tide, giving the troops the shortest distance of beach to cross and thus a shorter time exposed to German fire. As such, a series of obstacles were devised intended to be completely submerged during mid and high tides. These were combined with other devices all aimed at inhibiting the advance of the Allies as they tried to establish a foothold. In addition to land-mines (around six million in Northern France alone) and miles of barbed wire, the main types of obstacles employed by the Germans included:

Hedgehogs, or “Czech hedgehogs” – with or without explosives attached – were constructed from metal angle beams or i-beams (that is lengths with and L- or H-shaped cross section). The beams, when three were attached together, would stand even if knocked over due to their shape.

C Element
Drawing of a ‘Belgian Gate’ beach obstacle, known also as ‘C-element’

C-Element (or “Belgian Gates”), were a heavy steel fence about three meters wide and two meters high, typically mounted on concrete rollers and were used as a mobile anti-tank obstacle. Its invention is attributed to a French colonel, Léon-Edmond de Cointet de Fillain, who came up with the idea in 1933 for use in the French Maginot Line. Over 23,000 of these were employed by the Germans over 2,700 miles of coastline.

Wooden posts, with round flat land mines (called “teller mines”, after the German word for ‘plate’) were driven into the sand in the upright or slightly angled position. If a landing craft’s hull touched the mine at the top of the post it would explode. Other posts were embedded in a tripod configuration, and some were affixed with jagged steel “teeth” designed to tear holes in the hulls of landing craft.

Tetrahedra, can best be described as a three-sided skeletal pyramid. Just over 1m in height and constructed of steel-reinforced concrete they were designed as an anti-tank obstacle.

Networks Of Trenches Often Connected Different Elements Of Atlantic Wall Installations
Networks Of Trenches Often Connected Different Elements Of Atlantic Wall Installations

Hemmkurvenhindernis, another anti-tank obstacle, consisted of bent railway tracks. A long section of track was bent upwards at one end, supported at the higher end on either side by two short section of track.

Rommelspargel (or “Rommel’s Asparagus”), was used further inland as a defense against glider landings and parachutists. It consisted of a network of large posts fixed into the ground with sharpened tops that were intended to prevent gliders from landing in open areas. In addition, some low-lying river and estuarine areas were intentionally flooded for the same reason.

A Field Gun In An Open Circular Emplacement
A Field Gun In An Open Circular Emplacement

The manning and operation of the Atlantic Wall was administratively overseen by the German Army, with some support from Luftwaffe ground forces. The German Navy maintained a separate coastal defense network, organized into a number of sea defense zones. The strongpoints of the Atlantic Wall can be categorized as follows:

Divisional batteries, manned by the Army, could incorporate concrete constructions or could consist of temporary installations, such as batteries in field positions.

Coastal batteries, could be manned by the Army or the Navy. Originally guns were mounted in open emplacements, but due to Allied bombing these were mostly being converted to enclosed casemates.

Taken From A First World War Battleship This 380mm Gun Turret Was Installed At A Battery Near Le Havre
Taken From A First World War Battleship This 380mm Gun Turret Was Installed At A Battery Near Le Havre

Railroad batteries, manned by the Army, consisted of heavy calibre guns mounted on rail cars. Some of the first large caliber weapons to be moved into coastal areas in 1940 were rail mounted.

Flak batteries, manned by Luftwaffe units, these were designed to defend against Allied aircraft.

Strongpoints are generally known by an alphanumeric designation. Wiederstandnest, literally meaning “resistance nest”, were strongpoints manned in platoon strength – abbreviated as “W” or “Wn”. Similarly, larger sites manned in company-strength were known as Stützpunkt, or “support point”, abbreviated as “Stp”.

Machine Gun Tobruk
Machine Gun Tobruk

The whole Atlantic Wall project was a massive undertaking – and considered folly by many. It cost Germany an estimated 3.7 billion Deutschmarks and used 17 million cubic meters of concrete and 1.2 million tonnes of steel. Whilst formidable, the fortifications did not prevent the Allies from landing on D-Day, although well located firing positions were responsible for many of the British, American and Canadian losses in the first few days of fighting.

Fixed fortifications are monuments to the stupidity of mankind.

  • General George S. Patton, US Army

In Normandy today, you will find many surviving examples of Atlantic Wall defenses. Some require an entrance fee, but it is easy to explore many that do not. Perhaps the best example, and completely free, is the coastal artillery battery at Longues-sur-Mer (Wn 48). Each of the four Regelbau M272 casemates still house their 150mm Skoda guns, albeit some with extensive damage sustained in June 1944. At the cliff edge visitors can also explore the M262A observation post, which actually appears in the film The Longest Day.

Experience History for Yourself!
Get a discount of 15% to 70% on D-Day accommodations and tours! Look for deals here:
D-Day Hotels and Tours

 


Animals Used in WW2 Combat

In London W1 a memorial stands in honour of animals that served alongside British, Commonwealth and Allied forces during different 20th Century conflicts. Constructed from Portland Stone and cast bronze, ...

Battle of Normandy (The Beginning of the End)

Although D-Day had been a success with a foothold achieved on the shores or Western Europe and lower than feared casualty figures, the Allies' progress in the coming days and ...

D-Day Facts And Figures

D-Day was the largest amphibious assault and the largest combined operation in history. Two years in the planning, over the course of one day enough men and materiel were landed ...

D-Day Glossary

The Normandy landings of June 6, 1944, relied on a complex military infrastructure that developed its own specialized vocabulary—terms that sometimes confuse even dedicated history enthusiasts. This comprehensive glossary demystifies ...

D-Day Strategic Operations: Complete Codename Index

The success of the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944, relied on an intricate web of military operations, each with its own codename and specific objective. From the ...

Faces of Operation Overlord

Over 150,000 Allied troops were landed or dropped into Normandy on 6th June 1944. Many more would follow them. As well as the fighting forces, thousands of others performed vital ...

Operation Bodyguard (D-Day Deception)

Although the Germans knew an Allied invasion of north-west Europe was going to come - it was critical that the key details of exactly when and where remained a complete ...

Operation Neptune (D-Day Assault)

Operation Overlord is sometimes thought, albeit incorrectly, to refer solely to the Normandy landings on 6th June 1944 - or "D-Day" as it is more familiar to many. Overlord was, ...

Pegasus Bridge: The Strategic Capture That Turned The Tide On D-Day

In the early hours of June 6, 1944, a daring mission unfolded that marked the beginning of the Allied invasion of Normandy. British airborne troops, transported by gliders, launched a ...

Pointe du Hoc

Perched dramatically on Normandy’s northwestern coast, Pointe du Hoc still stands as a silent witness to one of World War II’s boldest missions. This 110-foot cliff, jutting out over the ...

Technology Used at D-Day

On June 6, 1944, Allied forces launched the largest amphibious invasion in military history, a massive assault that required innovative technology to succeed. Behind every brave American soldier who stormed ...

Timeline of D-Day Events

The 6th June 1944...the Longest Day. In the fervour of battle, it is completely understandable that there are sometimes conflicts between stated times for certain events. Sources give slightly differing ...

Scroll to Top